Rome and the Society, 1988–2025¶
Between the excommunications of 1988 and the consecrations of 2026 lie thirty-seven years of intermittent negotiation, four popes, repeated offers of a canonical structure, and two substantial concessions on the sacraments. None of it worked. Reading the sequence makes plain that the obstacle was never the liturgy — the Society had the older Missal secured from 2007 — and never the personal censures, which were remitted in 2009. It was one question that both sides kept returning to and neither could answer in the other's terms.
The question that never moved
Rome required assent to the Second Vatican Council as an act of the Church's magisterium, and recognition that the Mass of Paul VI is valid and licitly promulgated. The Society was willing to promise obedience, respect and silence, but not assent — holding that the Council's teaching on religious liberty, ecumenism and collegiality is erroneous and therefore cannot bind. Every canonical offer foundered there, and the 2026 Formula adhaesionis asks the same thing again.
The frost, 1988–2000¶
After the Gantin decree contact effectively ceased. The Society consolidated: seminaries, schools, priories, districts, and a settled account of itself as Catholic Tradition operating under a state of necessity. Rome's attention went to the communities that had left the Society — the FSSP, and from 1990 the Institute of Christ the King — and to the machinery of the Ecclesia Dei commission.
Two deaths in 1991 closed the founding generation: Archbishop Lefebvre on March 25 and Bishop de Castro Mayer a month later, both under censure. The Society elected Bishop Bernard Fellay Superior General in 1994, and his generalate — it would run to 2018 — was the period in which every serious negotiation took place.
The reopening, 2000–2006¶
In the Jubilee Year of 2000 several thousand Society faithful made a pilgrimage to Rome. Contacts followed through Cardinal Darío Castrillón Hoyos, then president of the Ecclesia Dei commission, and by 2001 an outline had emerged that would recur for two decades: a personal structure of some kind, in exchange for a doctrinal commitment.
The pattern of these years is worth naming because it repeats. Rome would offer a canonical form; the Society would answer with preconditions — in 2001, and again in 2006, the two standing demands were the withdrawal of the 1988 excommunications and the free use of the traditional Mass for every priest of the Latin rite. Rome regarded both as things to be settled inside an agreement; the Society regarded them as gestures required before one. Benedict XVI, elected in 2005, granted both — and the Society then declined to convert them into an agreement.
Bishop Fellay was received in audience by Benedict XVI on August 29, 2005, the first such meeting since 1988.
Summorum Pontificum, 2007¶
On July 7, 2007 Benedict XVI's motu proprio Summorum Pontificum declared that the Roman Missal promulgated by John XXIII in 1962 had "never been abrogated," established it as an extraordinary form of the one Roman Rite, and provided that any priest of the Latin rite could use it without permission in Masses without a congregation, and with the pastor's consent where a stable group of faithful requested it.
This was the Society's first standing demand, granted universally and without conditions attached to the Society. The accompanying letter to bishops made the motive explicit: the Pope wrote of reaching "an interior reconciliation in the heart of the Church," and of the need to make room for those attached to the older form so that "internal reconciliations" could follow.
The concession did not produce an agreement. It did, however, remove the liturgy as a plausible account of the dispute — a point Rome has made in every subsequent exchange, and made again in 2026.
The remission and the discussions, 2009–2012¶
-
January 2009 — the excommunications remitted
At the four bishops' request, the Congregation for Bishops remitted the 1988 censures by decree of January 21, published on January 24. The second standing demand was now met. Within days the affair was engulfed by Bishop Williamson's televised denial of the Holocaust, recorded before the remission and broadcast after it; the Holy See required him to recant unequivocally, and he did not.
-
March 2009 — Benedict XVI's letter to the bishops
An unusually personal letter conceded a communications failure over Williamson and then stated the limits of what had been done: remission concerned persons, not doctrine; the Society "does not possess a canonical status in the Church"; its ministers "do not exercise legitimate ministries." He added that the Council's doctrinal questions could not be passed over, since a body that "rejects the Church as she is today" cannot be reconciled by an administrative act.
-
2009–2011 — the doctrinal discussions
Eight rounds of formal talks between theologians of the CDF and of the Society, held in Rome and largely unpublished, covering the magisterium's authority, religious liberty, ecumenism, the relation of Church and state, and the new liturgy. Both sides reported afterwards that the differences had been clarified rather than reduced.
-
2011–2012 — the Doctrinal Preamble
In September 2011 the CDF presented a Doctrinal Preamble — the minimum doctrinal assent required for a canonical solution, whose text was never published. Fellay submitted answers in December 2011 and April 2012 that Rome judged insufficient; a further Society text of June 2012 was rejected. A personal prelature had been on the table. It was withdrawn with the Preamble unsigned, and Bishop Williamson was expelled from the Society in October of that year.
Decree remitting the excommunications, January 21, 2009 Benedict XVI, Letter to the Bishops, March 10, 2009
The Francis years, 2013–2021¶
Pope Francis changed the approach without changing the requirement. Where Benedict had pursued a doctrinal settlement first, Francis granted pastoral provisions for the faithful's sake while leaving the canonical question open.
- September 2015 — for the Jubilee of Mercy, faithful approaching Society priests "will validly and licitly receive the absolution of their sins."
- November 2016 — Misericordia et Misera extends the confession faculty indefinitely, "lest anyone ever be deprived of the sacramental sign of reconciliation."
- April 2017 — the Ecclesia Dei commission asks local ordinaries to secure canonical form for the marriages of Society faithful, by delegation where necessary.
- January 2019 — the Ecclesia Dei commission is suppressed and its competences transferred to the CDF, which had absorbed its doctrinal work since 2009.
- July 2021 — Traditionis Custodes reverses the framework of Summorum Pontificum, making the Missal of Paul VI "the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite" and returning regulation of the older books to diocesan bishops.
Each of the first three was an act of jurisdiction supplying what the Society lacked, and each therefore presupposed exactly the papal authority the Society's position holds in reserve. That paradox — accepting faculties from a Pope whose Council one refuses — is the subject of one of the sharper exchanges of the whole period. "Francis's grant of faculties proves the SSPX has jurisdiction"
Traditionis Custodes cut the other way. By restricting the older Missal in dioceses, it removed the practical alternative that had made staying in communion easy for many traditional Catholics, and the Society said so openly. Whatever one makes of the document, its effect on the Society was to strengthen rather than weaken it.
Stasis, 2018–2025¶
Fr. Davide Pagliarani was elected Superior General in July 2018, ending Fellay's twenty-four years and, with him, the generalate identified with negotiation. The Society's General Chapter of that year set out the position that would hold to 2026: no canonical agreement without a prior resolution of the doctrinal question, and no urgency about obtaining one.
Rome, for its part, had spent a decade discovering that concessions did not produce movement. Under Pope Leo XIV, elected in 2025, contacts continued at a low level. The Society's own accounts of these years describe patience; Rome's describe a file that had stopped moving.
The stasis ended on February 2, 2026, when the Society announced episcopal consecrations for July 1. The five months that ended the negotiation
Why every round failed¶
-
Assent, not obedience
The Society consistently offered obedience in practice and silence in public. Rome consistently required assent in principle — that the Council is an act of the Church's magisterium and its teaching is to be received, even where it is not defined dogma. No formula was ever found that both sides could read the same way.
-
The new Mass
Rome required recognition that the Missal of Paul VI is valid and lawfully promulgated. The Society was willing to concede validity in the abstract while continuing to describe the rite as harmful, which Rome did not regard as the same thing.
-
Sequence
Rome wanted doctrine settled, then structure. The Society wanted structure secured, then doctrine discussed from a position of standing. Every negotiation eventually turned into an argument about which came first.
-
Internal politics
Fellay's willingness to treat with Rome in 2012 nearly split the Society and cost him support; the priests who broke away over it did so on the ground that he had conceded too much. Any Superior General knew what an agreement would cost him at home.
Continue reading¶
-
The rupture these thirty-seven years were spent trying to repair.
-
Every event above with its date, its documents and its sources.
-
How the negotiation ended, in five months and four documents.
-
An annotated index of every text named on this page, with what each one actually did.