Skip to content

Confession after the decree

Of everything the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith said on July 2, 2026, this is the sentence that reached ordinary people first: "the sacrament of penance administered by them… [is] invalid." It is also the sentence most often misunderstood, in both directions — as a punishment invented for the occasion, or as a claim that the penitents' contrition counted for nothing. Neither is what the law says.

The short version

Absolution requires two things: the power of orders, which every priest has permanently, and the faculty to hear confessions, which the law makes a condition of the sacrament happening at all. Pope Francis supplied the missing faculty in 2015 and made the grant permanent in 2016; the July 2026 Note withdraws the ground on which those confessions stood. In danger of death any priest absolves validly, always, with no exceptions.

The canon that decides it

Can. 966 §1 is four lines long and does all the work:

For the valid absolution of sins it is required that, in addition to the power of orders, the minister possesses the faculty of exercising it for the faithful to whom he imparts absolution.

The phrase to notice is for the valid absolution. In most of the Church's sacramental law, an authorisation requirement governs lawfulness: a priest who baptises a child in another man's parish acts unlawfully, and the child is baptised. Penance is one of two places where the law says something stronger — the priest without the faculty does not absolve unlawfully, he does not absolve. The reason is that absolution is a judicial act. The priest is not performing a rite over a penitent but rendering a judgement in the Church's name, and a judge without jurisdiction hands down no sentence at all.

Can. 967–969 then set out who has the faculty: the Pope, cardinals and bishops everywhere by the law itself; priests with an office that carries it; and any priest to whom the ordinary of his place of incardination or of his residence grants it, which he may then use anywhere in the world unless a local ordinary objects. No SSPX priest holds an office in the Church's structure, and none is incardinated in a diocese or a canonically erected institute. That is the whole of the difficulty, and it long predates 2026.

Code of Canon Law, Can. 959–997

How the position moved, 1988 to 2026

  • 1988–2015 — no faculty, contested practice

    The Society held that the Church's crisis supplied what the law withheld, invoking Can. 144 on supplied jurisdiction and the general principle that the salvation of souls is the supreme law. Rome did not accept the argument, and canonists in Roman offices said so repeatedly. The practical consequence was decades in which the validity of the Society's confessions was genuinely disputed rather than settled either way.

  • September 2015 — the Jubilee grant

    In his letter for the Extraordinary Jubilee of Mercy, Pope Francis granted that the faithful who approached SSPX priests during the Holy Year "will validly and licitly receive the absolution of their sins." The word validly is decisive: the Pope was not overlooking an irregularity, he was supplying the faculty the law requires for validity — which is also a tacit acknowledgement that without the grant it was missing.

  • November 2016 — made permanent

    In Misericordia et Misera Francis extended the faculty beyond the Jubilee, "lest anyone ever be deprived of the sacramental sign of reconciliation through the Church's pardon," until further provision should be made. From that point until July 2026, a confession made in an SSPX chapel was valid, and this site said so.

  • July 2, 2026 — withdrawn

    The Explanatory Note states that the Society's ministers administer all sacraments illicitly and that "the sacrament of penance administered by them and matrimony assisted by them are invalid." The 2016 provision was a concession made in view of an eventual reconciliation; the act that made the Society formally schismatic removed its premise.

Francis, Letter for the Jubilee of Mercy, September 1, 2015 Misericordia et Misera, November 20, 2016 DDF Explanatory Note, July 2, 2026

The exception that never fails

Can. 976 admits no qualification of any kind:

Any priest, even though he lacks the faculty to hear confessions, can validly and licitly absolve any penitents who are in danger of death, from any censures and sins, even if an approved priest is present.

Every clause of that canon is aimed at removing an obstacle. Any priest — including one who is himself excommunicated, suspended or laicised. Any censures — including excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See. Even if an approved priest is present — so nobody need weigh alternatives at a deathbed. The Church has arranged her own law so that no one dies unabsolved for want of jurisdiction, and this has never depended on the standing of the Society or of anyone else.

Code of Canon Law, Can. 976

What about supplied jurisdiction?

Can. 144 §1 provides that in common error, whether of fact or of law, and in positive and probable doubt of law or of fact, the Church supplies executive power of governance for both the external and the internal forum — and §2 extends this expressly to the faculty for confessions. The Society has rested on this canon for four decades.

Two things must be true for it to apply. There must be an error that is common — held by the community as a whole, not by an individual — about the priest's possession of the faculty; or there must be a doubt that is positive and probable, meaning founded on real arguments, not merely on the absence of certainty.

A public declaration by the competent dicastery is precisely the act that extinguishes both conditions. After July 2, 2026 a congregation cannot be in common error about whether the Society's priests hold faculties, because Rome has said publicly that they do not and the fact has been reported worldwide; and there is no positive and probable doubt about the law, because the competent authority has resolved it. Whatever force the argument had before, the declaration is the specific thing that removes it.

The full argument and answer · Code of Canon Law, Can. 144

What to do about confessions already made

  • Before July 2, 2026

    Confessions made between the Jubilee grant of 2015 and July 1, 2026 were valid, on the Church's own provision. Nothing needs repeating. Confessions before 2015 were canonically doubtful at the time; if that troubles you, raise it with a confessor, who can resolve it in a few minutes rather than in years of anxiety.

  • On or after July 2, 2026

    Go to a priest in full communion and say at the outset where you have been confessing. You do not need a catalogue of a lifetime: bring what you remember of grave matter since your last certainly valid confession, and let him guide the rest. This is ordinary pastoral work and he will have expected it.

  • What good faith secures

    A penitent who confessed sincerely, believing the priest could absolve, is not culpable for the defect. Perfect contrition — sorrow for sin out of love of God, with the intention of confessing sacramentally — reconciles the sinner with God even before absolution is received. The sacrament is still to be sought; the soul was never abandoned.

  • If you are under a censure

    Excommunication is remitted through the procedure the DDF published on the same day, not in the confessional as an ordinary matter — though a confessor can and will tell you whether you are affected at all. Lay adherence "is not to be presumed automatically." Who is affected

Continue reading